Monthly Archives: August 2013

Common Core Stimulates Strange Alliance

Controversy over the implementation of the Common Core State Standards has served to highlight the sorry state of public education. According to its own website, The Common Core State Standards provide a consistent, clear understanding of what students are expected to learn, so teachers and parents know what they need to do to help them. Common Core was supposedly a state led initiative created by state departments of education. But the adoption of Common Core by 42 states in 2010 occurred in such rushed fashion with pressure from the Obama administration that it reminds many opponents of the adoption of Obama Care. Like Obama Care, the standards seem to have been developed by faceless bureaucrats in secret. Both teachers and parents feel that there was little to no input from them. Beginning in 2009, states were pressured to adopt the Common Core Standards through the lure of competitive federal Race to the Top grants. The adoption of a one size fits all national standard and pressure to quickly adopt it from the Obama administration, confirms, in the minds of many who mistrust big, overreaching federal control, that this is a top down approach to control the education of our children.

It has been said that politics creates strange bedfellows. Opposition to Common Core has arisen from such divergent groups as the Tea Party and teachers alike. There is opposition developing in almost every state and some states are beginning to back off. The Michigan legislature voted last week to withdraw funding from Common Core implementation and there is similar legislation pending in other states including liberal New York. Along with the Tea Party groups and Freedom Works, other conservative groups such as Concerned Women for America have rallied against Common Core. There is an active Facebook group with over 4200 members coordinating opposition. But, opposition is not confined to conservative groups. Teachers are leaving the profession out of frustration because control of what and how to teach has been taken away as they are forced to use scripted lessons or online curriculum to teach to tests. Frustration about “teaching to the test” dates back to the implementation of No Child Left Behind. In spite of assurances from Common Core advocates that academic freedom is preserved, the pressure to teach to the tests is overwhelming due to the high stakes nature of the results – no pass, no money, no job for teacher and student alike. The adoption of a nationwide curriculum is precisely what conservative parents fear, as history has demonstrated that such a curriculum will most likely have a liberal bias.

One teacher website dedicated to the opposition goes so far as to postulate a big corporate conspiracy to control education. Like many conspiracy theories, it is founded in a fair amount of truth. The author points to the undue influence of such corporations as Pearson over textbooks, curriculum and assessments. As a former Pearson employee, I can attest to the validity of her concerns. Having had personal discussions with Pearson executives, I can attest that the company was intimately involved in the Common Core initiative. Not surprisingly, the current Executive Director of the Common Core State Standards Organization (CCSSO) is a former Pearson employee. Pearson is a publicly held international corporation headquartered in the U.K. They are the leading educational publisher in the world. In addition to publishing textbooks, they develop curriculum and assessments as well as score the assessments. I was employed in the scoring division. I can assure you that their primary interest is in making a profit for their investors. As you might expect, the management is stocked with personnel from the educational establishment, many of whom have a very liberal viewpoint. Pearson aims to please its customers. Its customers are state boards of education, bureaucracies, not parents, students or teachers.

The aforementioned conspiracy teacher fears a private corporate takeover of education and advocates for the preservation of public control. He or she longs for the good old days when teachers were not measured for any objective standard of success. News flash: we’ve had a federal government controlled education system since the Dept. of Education was founded in the 1970s and like all socialist systems, it has failed miserably. Thus, we have the pressure for accountability through assessments. We are currently burdened with a government system controlled by unions and corporate cronies. State boards are appointed by politicians who are funded by unions and corporations. Teacher unions take money from teachers, who then give it overwhelmingly to Democrats who then legislate for more teachers, higher teacher pay and benefits and larger education bureaucracies. In return, the bureaucrats make sure that the schools educate the next generation of Democrat voters. Thus, kids graduate knowing how to put on a condom, and that the earth is on fire and that Republicans and capitalism are evil. But, they cannot read a set of instructions.

So, what’s the solution? As I have penned before, the best solution would be a private system where schools would be accountable to consumers, namely, parents. I agree with the conspiracy teacher that a private system controlled by Pearson or any other corporation would be a nightmare. But, privatization does not mean corporate control. Under such a system, funding (taxes) would be restored to the consumer. Competition would lead to quality and success. Companies that create textbooks, curriculum, and assessments and score assessments would be accountable to parents instead of politicized bureaucrats. Good teachers that love to teach would actually be paid better and deadbeats would be canned. Kids would grow up to be productive citizens rather than liberal Democrats.

Advertisements
Tagged

The Real Rapture

rapture

As a young Christian, I was raised on “dispensationalism”, a term which comes from the Bible referring to God’s timing and how He works differently at different times. We had it all figured out, just like the Jews of Jesus’ day. (But wait, they missed it! Are we?) According to what is known in theological circles as “pre-tribulational, post-Apostolic, literal Israel dispensationalism”, evil will increase until the end of the age when a seven year “great tribulation” will occur where a man possessed by Satan and known as the anti-Christ will come to power. According to this view, before this time, Christians will be secretly raptured up to heaven and escape this time of tribulation. The “Left Behind” series is based upon this scenario. According to the “literal Israel dispensation” view, the Jews in Israel will reestablish temple worship and sacrifices in a rebuilt temple in accordance with a pact with the anti-Christ who will break that pact after three and one-half years. In the “Left Behind” scenario, many people, including many Jews, will turn to Christ during this great tribulation and suffer great persecution including martyrdom. Strangely, those who advocate this view teach that the restraining influence of the Holy Spirit, in-dwelling believers, is what presently prevents the anti-Christ of Revelation from coming to power and that the Holy Spirit’s ministry through believers will leave this world at the rapture. But, the Bible teaches that it is the Holy Spirit who leads people to Christ. The obvious question arises: how will Jews be drawn to Christ during the tribulation if the Holy Spirit is absent?

Theologians who subscribe to this view interpret the Book of Revelation as a chronological account of the great tribulation. They see the Church age or age of grace since Calvary as the times of Gentiles. They believe that the Old Testament is the account of God’s dealings with the Jews, but believe that this dispensation is yet unfinished, and that a seven year tribulation remains for the Jews. This dispensational view is a relatively new doctrine. Its earliest roots can be traced to post reformation Catholic theologians who developed this theology in order to oppose the teaching of the reformers, including Luther, Calvin and Knox, who associated the institution of the papacy with the anti-Christ of scripture. Dispensational doctrine did not gain acceptance among Protestants until after 1830 as a result of a prophecy by a woman named Margaret McDonald who spoke of a secret coming of Christ for His church before the tribulation. The doctrine was spread by Charles Darby [Plymouth Brethren] and popularized by Scofield.

Acts 8 records a “great persecution”. Acts 22:19 says that Paul and his followers were “imprisoned and beat in every synagogue”.  How about the gospel being preached to all nations? Acts 2 records that  people from every nation under heaven were present at Pentecost when Peter preached the gospel in 33 AD. Colossians 1:23 says that the gospel has been preached to every creature. It was probably written before 70 AD.

Jesus next told His hearers that when they saw these signs they were to flee. Did anyone escape the destruction of Jerusalem? Yes, before  the city was destroyed, every Christian fled and escaped. Of course, they would have been the ones to have heard and passed on Jesus’ warning. And they knew what He was referring to. Josephus chronicles the great tribulation that occurred in Judea and Jerusalem prior to the destruction of Jerusalem. Even though Christians had survived, they could have been destroyed by famine had not the days been shortened.

Interestingly, the oldest or classical interpretation of Christ’s second coming teaches that the resurrection of the dead in Christ and the catching up of all believers to meet Him in the air will be immediately followed by His return to earth to rule for a millenium. (see W. Grudem, Systematic Theology, p. 1111)

Jesus promised that we would have tribulation in this life. (Jn 16:33) In that sense, this entire age can be considered a time of tribulation. Tribulation, trials and persecution have always been the experience of God’s people. History proves that early Christians experienced persecution and martyrdom in the 2nd and 3rd c. AD. Today, Christians are dying for their faith in Indonesia, Sudan, N. Korea, Vietnam, and China. Jesus’ prayer was not that we would be taken out of world but that we would be kept from evil (Jn 17:15)

We need to be careful not to be deceived about some secret coming of Christ. We should not be fixed on a preconceived idea of the future and Christ’s return; no one knows the day when He will return, but we should be prepared at all times. There is not one verse in the entire New Testament that mentions a seven year tribulation. We should not be deceived to think that we will never go through persecution or tribulation, great or small. We need to prepare our hearts that we might be faithful regardless of what cup God gives us to drink We can take great faith that Christ can miraculously deliver us or empower us to go through any persecution or tribulation. We’ll know it’s Him because we know Him and His word [we’ll meet Him in the air] not because he fulfills a predetermined set of circumstances.

 Jesus spoke of the “Great Tribulation” in the Olivet discourse and He referenced Daniel the prophet. Many have correctly interpreted this tribulation to be a fulfillment of another prophecy by Jeremiah of a time known as “Jacob’s trouble” in which the people of Jacob (Jews?) would experience great tribulation. In Daniel chapter 9 we have the record of an interpretation of a vision that Daniel received. He is told that the vision applies to “his people.” Obviously, that would be the Jews. But, if this time of great tribulation that Jesus was speaking of is for Jews, when did it or will it occur? That is the key question. Is the Great Tribulation for the future, or is it fulfilled or is it continually unfolding even now?

Jesus spoke of His return in the Olivet discourse recorded in Mt. 24, Mark 13 and Luke 21. Jesus begins by issuing a warning: “don’t be deceived.” His disciples, along with most everyone of the time, were. They had assumed that the destruction of the temple that Jesus had just prophesied would occur in conjunction with the end of the age and the commencement of His earthly rule. They could not have been more deceived! The temple would be destroyed along with Jerusalem in 70 AD. We still await the end of the age and Christ’s return. Jesus gave a specific sign that the destruction of Jerusalem was about to take place.  He called it the “abomination of desolation spoken of by Daniel” (Mt. 24:14). In Luke 21:20, Jesus makes clear what He refers to, “But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then know that its desolation is near.” He was referring to a prophecy in Daniel 9 that is frequently misinterpreted by dispensationalists. “Seventy ‘sevens’ [490] are decreed for your people and your holy city to finish transgression, to put an end to sin, to atone for wickedness, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy and to anoint the most holy. ‘Know and understand this: From the issuing of the decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One, the ruler, comes, there will be seven ‘sevens,’ and sixty-two ‘sevens.’ It will be rebuilt with streets and a trench, but in times of trouble. After the sixty-two ‘sevens,’ the Anointed One will be cut off and will have nothing. The people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end will come like a flood: War will continue until the end, and desolations have been decreed. He will confirm a covenant with many for one ‘seven.’ In the middle of the ‘seven’ he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And on the wing of abominations shall be one who makes desolate. (NIV: wing [of the temple]” NIV translators bracket this term because it is not in the original manuscript!”) he will set up an abomination that causes desolation, until the end that is decreed is poured out on him. “ (Daniel 9:24-27, NIV)

We must understand that one of the major rules of biblical interpretation is that the New Testament interprets the Old. So if the New Testament explains what Jesus meant when He used the term “abomination of desolation,” then that has to be the meaning of the term in Daniel. In Luke 21:20 Jesus makes it clear that the abomination is pagan armies surrounding Jerusalem. Jesus was answering questions about the destruction of Jerusalem. It is clear that what was to become a desolation was Jerusalem.

The dispensational, futurist interpretation is that the term “abomination of desolation” refers to an idol being erected in a rebuilt Jewish temple by the anti-Christ. The word “temple” is not in the original language of Daniel 9:27!! In the original language the term “wing” in verse 27 refers to the wing of a bird or an army and is never used to refer to a wing of a building or temple. The NIV translation in this case is a severe and dishonest capitulation to Scofield theology by the translators. Jesus made it clear that the abomination was to be seen. It wouldn’t be seen in the temple, only the high priest would see it there. Jesus never mentions a future temple in this scripture. Be assured that if the Jews rebuild the temple prior to the return of Christ, it won’t be God’s temple. Believers in Christ are God’s temple today and forever. A rebuilt temple and animal sacrifices will be an abomination to God. Christ said, “it is finished.” The book of Hebrews makes it clear that “there no longer remains any sacrifice for sin.” (He 10:18)

All Christian theologians/historians agree that the first 69 weeks of Daniel’s prophecy were fulfilled up to the time of Christ. Dispensationalists put a 2000-year gap between the 69th and the 70th week. But, grammatically, the passage refers to a single unified period of time. Daniel 9:24-27 is a prophecy about Christ, not the anti-Christ. Jerusalem was restored. The streets were rebuilt in troubled times, the resistance mentioned by Ezra and Nehemiah. The Most Holy was anointed. The Most Holy is Jesus. “The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because he has anointed me to preach good news to the poor.” (Luke 4:18) Dispensationalists say this refers to anointing of a future temple. Only God can anoint something as holy. God will not anoint a new temple for carnal sacrifice in conflict with the finished work of Christ.

An end of transgressions was made. Jesus cried, “it is finished.” It was finished at Calvary. Jesus came to save from sin. He is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. He made an end of sins. He made reconciliation for iniquity. He brought in everlasting righteousness. The canon of scripture has been closed and Christ has fulfilled prophecy. The sealing up of vision and prophecy refers to Jesus fulfilling scripture.

Daniel 9:26 records that Messiah would be cut off after 69 weeks. That means He had to be killed in the 70th week. In fact, He was crucified after a three and one-half year ministry, or in the middle of a seven-year period. Daniel says, “He shall confirm the covenant with many for one week.” Dispensationalists say that “he” refers to the anti-Christ. The prophecy never mentions or refers to the anti-Christ. Grammatically, the pronoun “he” in v 27 must refer to Messiah. The scripture doesn’t say he made a covenant of seven-year duration, but that He would confirm it with Israel for 7 years. It doesn’t say that he would make a new covenant, as dispensationalists argue, but that He would “confirm the covenant”, referring to the everlasting covenant. Jesus confirmed the covenant through His sacrifice. He even said that His ministry was first directed to Daniel’s people. The word “confirm” could also be interpreted “prevailed with”; Jesus prevailed with Daniel’s people for three and one-half years. The Apostles, as Christ’s representatives, continued to preach to the Jews for the remaining three and one-half years. Luke 21 makes it clear that the “abomination that causes desolation” is Roman armies surrounding Jerusalem. The Lord’s prophecy of Jerusalem’s destruction is fulfilled! The tribulation of those days was indeed great. Over two million Jews killed. The “great tribulation” of those days was cut short as the Lord promised that it would be.

The classical, most prevalent, teaching of the church has been that believers will endure a time of tribulation when the anti-Christ persecutes the church. Nowhere in scripture is there given a seven year time period for this persecution. At the end of this time, Christ will return to rule on earth. As He returns, the dead in Christ will be raised first and then those of us who remain will be transformed and we shall all meet Him in the air. We shall immediately descend to earth with Him to conquer His enemies and rule for a thousand years.

Scofield also popularized the doctrine of a separate Apostolic dispensation which ended when the original Apostles died and after which the charismatic gifts of the Holy Spirit (as enumerated in 1Corinthians 12) ceased to function. This doctrine of ceasationism lacks any serious biblical justification and is refuted by church history to the present day. Curiously, in this day, even Pentecostals and charismatics have embraced Scofield’s pre-tribulation theology.

Scofield and the dispensationalists see the tribulation as a fulfillment of Dan 9:24-27 with a 2,000 year gap between the 69th and 70th week. According to them, Jesus has a bride which is the church and then a separate relationship with the Jews. But the Bible says that Jesus has removed the dividing wall, that in Christ there is neither Jew nor Gentile, but rather one new man (Colossians 3:10-11).

The notion of a pre-tribulation rapture is easily refuted by scripture. 1Thessalonians 4:15 makes it clear that the dead in Christ will be raised or caught up before those who remain alive at Christ’s return. Rev 20:4-5 refers to the “first resurrection” [rapture] as including those who had been martyred during the “great tribulation”. “I saw thrones on which were seated those who had been given authority to judge. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony for Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or his image and had not received his mark on their foreheads or their hands. They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years. (The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.) This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy are those who have part in the first resurrection. The second death has no power over them, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with him for a thousand years.” (Rev. 20:4-6) How could this be, if the rapture precedes the “great tribulation.” 1Thessalonians 4:17, referring to the resurrection of the dead who are in Christ, refutes a secret rapture in referring to “a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God.” A trumpet call is not a secret thing. In biblical culture, the trumpet call was sounded to proclaim a public feast, to sound the alarm for battle or to announce the coming of the King, all of which are done publicly and openly, not secretly. In fact, Jesus warned us not to believe any reports that He had come in secret. “At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Christ!’ or, ‘Look, there he is!’ do not believe it.” (Mark 13:21) The Bible says, “every eye will see Him.” (Revelation 1:7)

One of the dangers of this dispensational view is that we indulge ourselves in escapism. This theology is really only popular in America, where escaping from problems is a way of life. How will people who have been indoctrinated into this theology respond if they are faced with persecution? Will they lose faith? There is also a danger of losing our focus on the great commission and preparing the earth to receive her King. If our focus is on how we are going to escape tribulation, we may ignore the call to evangelism, especially if it becomes costly.

If the pre-tribulation rapture doesn’t pan out it could set people up for disappointment. Many might fall away in disillusionment. The Bible warns of such an occurrence at the end of the age, before Christ’s return: “Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;” (2Thess. 2:2-3).  The scripture is referring to the day of Christ’s return and Paul is writing to tell them that they haven’t missed it.

Jesus promised that in this life we would endure tribulation. This age is the tribulation! The scripture is certain that the day of Christ’s coming will not occur until we see the “man of sin”. Paul clearly said that the anti-Christ would come before the resurrection and Christ’s return. Christians in this country are being massively deceived! They are being led to believe that they will be secretly raptured away before tribulation. What happens when they are disappointed? Then we shall see the massive falling away that the Bible warns of! We shouldn’t attempt to put God in a box of our own making. We could end up disappointed like the Jews of Jesus’ day.

I believe that this pre-tribulation rapture theory is the biggest mass deception foisted upon believers in all of history! The Bible never teaches any “secret” coming of Jesus for His people who happen to be Gentiles while the other part of His bride must endure tribulation. Jesus is not a polygamist. There will be no wedding feast until the whole Bride is in attendance. Jesus warned us not to believe anyone who proclaimed His coming in secret. Just the reverse, the scripture is very clear that at His second coming, “every eye shall see Him”. We shall all face Him in judgement.

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continue reading

Tagged ,